Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
48
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 258336 | 89694 |
| GPU | 183669 | 34389 |
| Memory | 138904 | 53247 |
| UX | 176993 | 58498 |
| NanoReview Score | 757902 | 235828 |
| Stability | n/a | 98 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 1 fps |
| File Compression | 154.3 MB/s | 74.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 81.6 pages/s | 39.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 109.9 MP/sec | 49.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.7 frames/s | 1.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 25 frames/s | 9.53 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 55.8 frames/s | 14.3 frames/s |
| HDR | 93 MP/sec | 44.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.14 MP/sec | 2.22 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 29 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 28 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 27 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 53 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 57 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 30 FPS (High) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) - 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) |
- 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 11 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 1.75 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 810 | Adreno 610 |
| Architecture | Adreno 800 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 895 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 256 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3360x1600 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Qualcomm X62 5G | X12 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2900 MB/s | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | April, 2019 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM6650 | SM6125 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
