Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
23
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 89180 | 362347 |
| GPU | 36992 | 290734 |
| Memory | 56965 | 192671 |
| UX | 68869 | 253267 |
| NanoReview Score | 252006 | 1099019 |
| Stability | 96 % | 81 % |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | 47 fps |
| File Compression | 71.3 MB/s | 137.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 41.6 pages/s | 122.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 51.8 MP/sec | 168.9 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.89 frames/s | 12.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 10.2 frames/s | 41.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 13.6 frames/s | 104.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 46.2 MP/sec | 137.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.97 MP/sec | 4.33 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Kryo 260 Gold Cortex-A73) - 4/1.84 (Kryo 260 Silver Cortex-A53) |
- 1/3.05 (Cortex-X2) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-A710) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 3050 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv9-A |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | 1.75 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 512 | Mali-G710 MP10 |
| Architecture | Adreno 500 | Valhall 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 647 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 10 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 64 |
| Total shader | 128 | 640 |
| FLOPS | 165.6 GFLOPS | 1085.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 11 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 680 | MediaTek APU 590 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 3750 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 60 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2560x1600 pixels | 3200x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | X12 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 7000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2017 yr | November, 2021 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | SM6115 | MT6983 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 9000 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
