Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
25
out 100
VS
35
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 88940 | 146117 |
| GPU | 35063 | 83020 |
| Memory | 66717 | 97461 |
| UX | 54986 | 116630 |
| NanoReview Score | 245706 | 443228 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | 7 fps |
| File Compression | 78 MB/s | 106.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 41 pages/s | 58.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 51.3 MP/sec | 79.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.85 frames/s | 6.37 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 10.2 frames/s | 20.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 14.5 frames/s | 43.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 45.9 MP/sec | 68.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.2 MP/sec | 2.86 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
28 FPS (Low) | 66 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
30 FPS (Ultra) | 60 FPS (Low) |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | 24 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
54 FPS (Low) | 67 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
59 FPS (Medium) | 57 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
30 FPS (High) | 42 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 19 FPS (Low) |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco M3 (1080x2340) | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
- 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold Cortex-A78) - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 11 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | 1.75 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 128 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 683 | Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X11 | Snapdragon X51 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 390 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | January, 2020 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM615 | SM6375 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
