Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
25
out 100
VS
39
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, vs Samsung Exynos 9820. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 88940 | 170665 |
| GPU | 35063 | 197730 |
| Memory | 66717 | 127795 |
| UX | 54986 | 128053 |
| NanoReview Score | 245706 | 624243 |
| Stability | 99 % | 82 % |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | 19 fps |
| File Compression | 78 MB/s | 100.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 41 pages/s | 67.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 51.3 MP/sec | 68.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.85 frames/s | 6.22 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 10.2 frames/s | 21.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 14.5 frames/s | 46.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 45.9 MP/sec | 78.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.2 MP/sec | 3.01 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
28 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
30 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
54 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
59 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
30 FPS (High) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco M3 (1080x2340) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
- 2/2.73 (Mongoose M4) - 2/2.31 (Cortex-A75) - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2730 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 11 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor count | 1.75 billion | 8.5 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 702 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 12 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 24 |
| Total shader | 128 | 288 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 404.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 683 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X11 | Exynos 5100 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 20 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 390 MB/s | Up to 2000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 316 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | January, 2020 yr | November, 2018 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | SM615 | S5E9820 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 9820 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
