Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Apple A12 Bionic
31
out 100
VS
50
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Apple A12 Bionic. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 116467 | 198067 |
| GPU | 43728 | 185355 |
| Memory | 109871 | 152138 |
| UX | 78916 | 164631 |
| NanoReview Score | 348982 | 700191 |
| Stability | 99 % | 69 % |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | 31 fps |
| File Compression | 100 MB/s | 108.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 39.7 pages/s | 61.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 59.8 MP/sec | 78.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.44 frames/s | 10.6 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 11 frames/s | 36.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 17 frames/s | 21.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 52 MP/sec | 89.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.76 MP/sec | 3.35 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 2/2.49 (Vortex) - 4/1.6 (Tempest) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2800 | 2490 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 6.9 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 610 | Apple A12 GPU |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Apple Bionic GPU |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 64 |
| Total shader | 128 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 576 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | n/a |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 686 | Neural Engine |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | NVMe |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2688x1242 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AAC‑LC - AAX и AAX+ - Apple Lossless - HE‑AAC - HE‑AAC v2 - Linear PCM - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | X11 | Intel XMM 7560 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 390 MB/s | Up to 1000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 350 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | September, 2018 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | SM6225-AD | APL1W81 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A12 Bionic the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
