Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Google Tensor G2
31
out 100
VS
56
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Google Tensor G2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 116467 | 256594 |
| GPU | 43728 | 315697 |
| Memory | 109871 | 168964 |
| UX | 78916 | 194845 |
| NanoReview Score | 348982 | 936100 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | 36 fps |
| File Compression | 100 MB/s | 166.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 39.7 pages/s | 107.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 59.8 MP/sec | 117.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.44 frames/s | 14.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 11 frames/s | 37.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 17 frames/s | 87.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 52 MP/sec | 122.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.76 MP/sec | 4.52 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 | 2850 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 610 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 7 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 64 |
| Total shader | 128 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 759.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 686 | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X11 | Exynos 5300g |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 390 MB/s | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | October, 2022 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | SM6225-AD | GS201 (S5P9855) |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Tensor G2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
