Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Google Tensor G5

Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Google Tensor G5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 and Google Tensor G5
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
348982
Google Tensor G5
1445942
CPU116467321891
GPU43728490471
Memory109871321568
UX78916312012
NanoReview Score3489821445942
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
641
Google Tensor G5
n/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test3 fpsn/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
473
Google Tensor G5
2267
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
1510
Google Tensor G5
5712
File Compression100 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser39.7 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering59.8 MP/secn/a
Background Blur3.44 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing11 frames/sn/a
Image Detection17 frames/sn/a
HDR52 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing2.76 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
- 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
- 1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
- 5x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A725
- 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A520
Process TSMC TSMC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2800 3400
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
Process tech. 6 nm 3 nm

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Adreno 610 n/a
Architecture Adreno 600 n/a
GPU Frequency 1260 MHz 1100 MHz
Execution Units 1 n/a
Shader Units 128 n/a
Total shader 128 n/a
FLOPS 322.6 GFLOPS 1536 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.1 n/a
OpenCL 2.0 n/a
DirectX 12.1 n/a

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 17 Gbit/s n/a
Max RAM 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1
- UFS 4.0
Max. resolution 2520x1080 pixels 3840x2400 pixels
Camera 1x108 pixels 1x200 pixels
Video recording 1K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video quality 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X11 n/a
4G Support LTE Cat. 13 n/a
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 390 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 5 7
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS

Other

Announced March, 2023 yr August, 2025 yr
Class Low end Flagship
Codename SM6225-AD n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below