Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
31
out 100
VS
67
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 116467 | 430571 |
| GPU | 43728 | 551063 |
| Memory | 109871 | 212421 |
| UX | 78916 | 132317 |
| NanoReview Score | 348982 | 1326372 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 100 MB/s | 155.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 39.7 pages/s | 101.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 59.8 MP/sec | 117.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.44 frames/s | 11.9 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 11 frames/s | 34.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 17 frames/s | 60.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 52 MP/sec | 95.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.76 MP/sec | 4.78 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 1x 2.285 GHz – - 3x 2.05 GHz – - 4x 1.3 GHz – |
| Process | TSMC | SMIC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 | 2285 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 7 nm |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 610 | Maleoon 920 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Maleoon |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shader | 128 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 686 | Da Vinci |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | n/a |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X11 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 390 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Class | Low end | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM6225-AD | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
