Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Unisoc T9100

Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Unisoc T9100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 and Unisoc T9100
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
348982
Unisoc T9100
536829
CPU116467185004
GPU4372889977
Memory109871124678
UX78916137170
NanoReview Score348982536829
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
641
Unisoc T9100
n/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test3 fpsn/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
473
Unisoc T9100
891
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
1510
Unisoc T9100
2445
File Compression100 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser39.7 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering59.8 MP/secn/a
Background Blur3.44 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing11 frames/sn/a
Image Detection17 frames/sn/a
HDR52 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing2.76 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
- 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
- 1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
- 3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
- 4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
Process TSMC TSMC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2800 2700
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process tech. 6 nm 6 nm

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU Frequency 1260 MHz 780 MHz
Execution Units 1 4
Shader Units 128 32
Total shader 128 128
FLOPS 322.6 GFLOPS 199.7 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.1 1.3
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX 12.1 n/a

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Hexagon 686 Yes
GPU Frequency n/a 8 TOPS

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 2x16 bit
Bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
Max RAM 8 GB 32 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 2.2 - eMMC 5.1
- UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.1
Max. resolution 2520x1080 pixels 3440x1440 pixels
Camera 1x108 pixels 1x108 pixels
Video recording 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video quality 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X11 n/a
4G Support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 18
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 390 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 5 5
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo

Other

Announced March, 2023 yr March, 2025 yr
Class Low end Mid-range
Codename SM6225-AD n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below