Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
32
out 100
VS
19
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 690, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 134363 | 49828 |
| GPU | 60115 | 18186 |
| Memory | 77269 | 42347 |
| UX | 111051 | 25943 |
| NanoReview Score | 382798 | 136304 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 94.4 MB/s | 48.5 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 49.3 pages/s | 23.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 64.1 MP/sec | 36.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.55 frames/s | 0.91 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 16.9 frames/s | 5.11 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 37.4 frames/s | 9.42 frames/s |
| HDR | 58.8 MP/sec | 25.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.62 MP/sec | 1.36 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
8x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 1800 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 2 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 3 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 619 | Adreno 506 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 565 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 48 |
| Total shader | 256 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 289.3 GFLOPS | 57.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 692 | Hexagon 546 |
| GPU Frequency | 5 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 1x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 14.9 Gbit/s | 7.46 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
eMMC 5.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 1920x1200 pixels |
| Camera | 1x192 pixels | 1x21 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 | X9 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 900 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | June, 2020 yr | June, 2017 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | SM6350 | SDM450 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
