Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek MT6737
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs MediaTek MT6737. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 146117 | 16596 |
| GPU | 83020 | 2974 |
| Memory | 97461 | 27828 |
| UX | 116630 | 11691 |
| NanoReview Score | 443228 | 59089 |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 106.3 MB/s | 39.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 58.3 pages/s | 17.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 79.4 MP/sec | 17.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 6.37 frames/s | 0.89 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 20.9 frames/s | 5.03 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 43.4 frames/s | 6.57 frames/s |
| HDR | 68.1 MP/sec | 17.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.86 MP/sec | 1.04 MP/sec |
Games
PUBG Mobile |
66 FPS (Low) | n/a |
Call of Duty: Mobile |
60 FPS (Low) | n/a |
Fortnite |
24 FPS (Low) | n/a |
Shadowgun Legends |
67 FPS (Low) | n/a |
World of Tanks Blitz |
57 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
Genshin Impact |
42 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
19 FPS (Low) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold Cortex-A78) - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver Cortex-A55) |
4/1.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 1300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 1 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 619 | Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Midgard 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 10 |
| Total shader | 256 | 20 |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 26 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 686 | No |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 1x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 6.4 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 3 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
eMMC 5.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 1280x720 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x13 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
H.264 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 | MT6169 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1500 MB/s | Up to 50 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 4 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 4.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
GPS |
Other
| Announced | October, 2021 yr | January, 2016 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM6375 | MT6737 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
PUBG Mobile
Call of Duty: Mobile
Fortnite
Shadowgun Legends
World of Tanks Blitz
Genshin Impact
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang