Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
35
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Unisoc Tiger T612. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 146117 | 91018 |
| GPU | 83020 | 22600 |
| Memory | 97461 | 65184 |
| UX | 116630 | 65914 |
| NanoReview Score | 443228 | 244716 |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | 2 fps |
| File Compression | 106.3 MB/s | 76.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 58.3 pages/s | 43.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 79.4 MP/sec | 53.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 6.37 frames/s | 4.12 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 20.9 frames/s | 14.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 43.4 frames/s | 25 frames/s |
| HDR | 68.1 MP/sec | 44.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.86 MP/sec | 2.22 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
66 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
60 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
24 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
67 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
57 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
42 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
19 FPS (Low) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold Cortex-A78) - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver Cortex-A55) |
- 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 1800 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 32 |
| Total shader | 256 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 39.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 686 | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2400x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1500 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | October, 2021 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | SM6375 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
