Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2, vs Samsung Exynos 2500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 and Samsung Exynos 2500
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
1124140
Samsung Exynos 2500
2213797
CPU349844500921
GPU338796928912
Memory195051410202
UX240449373762
NanoReview Score11241402213797
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
7530
Samsung Exynos 2500
n/a
Stability84 %n/a
Graphics Test45 fpsn/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
1697
Samsung Exynos 2500
2648
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
4404
Samsung Exynos 2500
9881
File Compression176.4 MB/s386.4 MB/s
HTML5 Browser115.8 pages/s234.1 pages/s
PDF Rendering157.2 MP/sec272.4 MP/sec
Background Blur16.2 frames/s36.6 frames/s
Photo Processing41.8 frames/s86.3 frames/s
Image Detection114 frames/s246.4 frames/s
HDR134.1 MP/sec313.6 MP/sec
Ray Tracing4.67 MP/sec13 MP/sec

Games

Graphics in popular 3D games
PUBGPUBG Mobile 77 FPS (Ultra) n/a
CODCall of Duty: Mobile 59 FPS (Ultra) n/a
FortniteFortnite 38 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Shadow LegendsShadowgun Legends 81 FPS (Ultra) n/a
World of Tanks BlitzWorld of Tanks Blitz 116 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Mobile Legends: Bang BangGenshin Impact 114 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Genshin ImpactMobile Legends: Bang Bang 53 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Device Xiaomi Poco F5 (1080x2400) n/a

Processor

Architecture - 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X2
- 3x 2.49 GHz – Cortex-A710
- 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
- 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
- 2x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A725
- 3x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
- 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Process TSMC Samsung
Cores count 8 10
Frequency 2910 3300
Instruction set n/a ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 1024 KB n/a
L2 cache 2 MB n/a
L3 Cache 8 MB n/a
Process tech. 4 nm 3 nm
Transistor count 10.2 billion n/a
Power (TDP) 6 W n/a

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Adreno 725 Samsung Xclipse 950
Architecture Adreno 700 RDNA 3.5
GPU Frequency 580 MHz 1300 MHz
Execution Units 2 8
Shader Units 512 n/a
Total shader 1024 n/a
FLOPS 1187.8 GFLOPS n/a
Vulkan 1.1 1.4
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX 12.1 12.1

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Yes

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 77 Gbit/s
Max RAM 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.1
Max. resolution 2560x1600 pixels 3840x2160 pixels
Camera 1x200 pixels n/a
Video recording 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video quality 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X62 n/a
4G Support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G Support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4400 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 1600 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 6 7
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- SBAS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced March, 2023 yr August, 2025 yr
Class Mid-range Flagship
Codename SM7475-AB S5E9955

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below