Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
33
out 100
VS
20
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 141170 | 85476 |
| GPU | 72788 | 25195 |
| Memory | 74189 | 47099 |
| UX | 100912 | 54722 |
| NanoReview Score | 389059 | 212492 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | 1 fps |
| File Compression | 92.6 MB/s | 68 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 45.7 pages/s | 33.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 63.4 MP/sec | 44.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.25 frames/s | 1.71 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 17.1 frames/s | 8.66 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 35.5 frames/s | 11 frames/s |
| HDR | 56.7 MP/sec | 37.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.54 MP/sec | 1.82 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
43 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
40 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
28 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
51 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
30 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
34 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
| Device | Realme 7 Pro (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76) - 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
- 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) - 4x 1.6 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 | 1800 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 2 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 618 | Adreno 509 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 430 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 256 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 110.1 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 692 | Hexagon 680 |
| GPU Frequency | 5 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 14.9 Gbit/s | 5.3 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.1 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 1900x1200 pixels |
| Camera | 1x192 pixels | 1x24 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | 384 kHz/32 bit | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X15 | X12 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 15 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 800 MB/s | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | January, 2020 yr | October, 2017 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM7125 | SDM636 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
