Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
33
out 100
VS
47
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 141170 | 232691 |
| GPU | 72788 | 195541 |
| Memory | 74189 | 142021 |
| UX | 100912 | 188011 |
| NanoReview Score | 389059 | 758192 |
| Stability | 99 % | 91 % |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | 23 fps |
| File Compression | 92.6 MB/s | 150.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 45.7 pages/s | 84.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 63.4 MP/sec | 109.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.25 frames/s | 10.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 17.1 frames/s | 32.6 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 35.5 frames/s | 74.7 frames/s |
| HDR | 56.7 MP/sec | 102.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.54 MP/sec | 4.19 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
43 FPS (High) | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
40 FPS (Ultra) | 61 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
28 FPS (Low) | 30 FPS (Ultra) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
51 FPS (Ultra) | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
30 FPS (High) | 59 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
34 FPS (Medium) | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | Realme 7 Pro (1080x2400) | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76) - 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
- 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) - 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 | 2840 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 10.3 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 587 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shader | 256 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 901.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 692 | Hexagon 698 |
| GPU Frequency | 5 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 14.9 Gbit/s | 44 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.1 | - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x192 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | 384 kHz/32 bit | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X15 | X55 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 15 | LTE Cat. 22 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 800 MB/s | Up to 7500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 3000 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | January, 2020 yr | December, 2019 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | SM7125 | SM8250-AB |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
