Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2
42
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 197832 | 679852 |
| GPU | 137751 | 1283493 |
| Memory | 118406 | 646515 |
| UX | 143253 | 505422 |
| NanoReview Score | 597242 | 3115282 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 14 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 160 MB/s | 421.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 64.3 pages/s | 268 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 97.1 MP/sec | 300.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.1 frames/s | 42.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 20.3 frames/s | 115.6 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 55.6 frames/s | 353.8 frames/s |
| HDR | 91.7 MP/sec | 339.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.27 MP/sec | 14.1 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
59 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
42 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
27 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
49 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
94 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
53 FPS (High) | n/a |
| Device | Oppo Realme GT Master Edition (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) - 3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
- 2x 4.6 GHz - - 6x 3.63 GHz - |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 | 4600 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 16 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 642 | n/a |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | n/a |
| Execution Units | 2 | n/a |
| Shader Units | 256 | n/a |
| Total shader | 512 | n/a |
| FLOPS | 563.2 GFLOPS | 3990 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | n/a |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 770 | Hexagon |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | n/a |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
- UFS 4.0 - UFS 4.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | n/a |
| Camera | 1x192 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X53 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 3700 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2021 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | SM7325 | SM8850 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
