Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
64
out 100
VS
87
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, vs Samsung Exynos 2400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 315665 | 451893 |
| GPU | 426818 | 722765 |
| Memory | 192834 | 300546 |
| UX | 234257 | 290016 |
| NanoReview Score | 1169574 | 1765220 |
| Graphics Test | 40 fps | 83 fps |
| File Compression | 154.9 MB/s | 271 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 112.7 pages/s | 207.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 147.2 MP/sec | 220.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 13.8 frames/s | 21.8 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 36.3 frames/s | 65.3 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 94 frames/s | 159.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 122 MP/sec | 211.5 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.39 MP/sec | 7.4 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
88 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
42 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
89 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
114 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
40 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2 - 3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3000 | 3210 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5.3 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 730 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| Architecture | Adreno 700 | Magellan (RDNA 3) |
| GPU Frequency | 818 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 512 | 128 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 1675.3 GFLOPS | 3406.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X65 | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 10000 MB/s | Up to 9640 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 MB/s | Up to 2550 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | December, 2021 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | SM8450 | S5E9945 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2400 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
