Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek MT6737
92
out 100
VS
10
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs MediaTek MT6737. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 436420 | 16596 |
| GPU | 870679 | 2974 |
| Memory | 392296 | 27828 |
| UX | 352620 | 11691 |
| NanoReview Score | 2052015 | 59089 |
| Stability | 73 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 89 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 288.3 MB/s | 39.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 198.1 pages/s | 17.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 227.4 MP/sec | 17.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 26.7 frames/s | 0.89 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 64.9 frames/s | 5.03 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 174.5 frames/s | 6.57 frames/s |
| HDR | 238.2 MP/sec | 17.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 7.38 MP/sec | 1.04 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
144 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
144 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
144 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi 14 Pro | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 3x 3.15 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 2x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A720 |
4/1.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 4 |
| Frequency | 3300 | 1300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 1 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 8 W | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 750 | Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 700 | Midgard 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 770 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | 6 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 10 |
| Total shader | 1536 | 20 |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 26 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon | No |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 1x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 76.8 Gbit/s | 6.4 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 3 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 4.0 - UFS 4.1 |
eMMC 5.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 1280x720 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x13 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
H.264 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X75 | MT6169 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 10000 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3500 MB/s | Up to 50 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 4 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 4.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
GPS |
Other
| Announced | October, 2023 yr | January, 2016 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM8650-AB, SM8650-AC | MT6737 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
