Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
43
out 100
VS
32
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 189310 | 134363 |
| GPU | 155621 | 60115 |
| Memory | 121534 | 77269 |
| UX | 177225 | 111051 |
| NanoReview Score | 643690 | 382798 |
| Stability | 97 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 20 fps | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 115.2 MB/s | 94.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 67.6 pages/s | 49.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 89.4 MP/sec | 64.1 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 7.65 frames/s | 5.55 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 26.4 frames/s | 16.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 53.8 frames/s | 37.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 79.4 MP/sec | 58.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.58 MP/sec | 2.62 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
58 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
54 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
56 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
98 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
56 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime) - 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
- 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2960 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor count | 6.7 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 640 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 675 MHz | 565 MHz |
| Execution Units | 3 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 128 |
| Total shader | 768 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 1036.8 GFLOPS | 289.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 690 | Hexagon 692 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 5 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.13 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x192 pixels | 1x192 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X24 LTE, X50 5G | Snapdragon X51 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 20 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 5000 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1240 MB/s | Up to 900 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | April, 2019 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM8150-AC | SM6350 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
