Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
43
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 189310 | 274580 |
| GPU | 155621 | 237549 |
| Memory | 121534 | 154592 |
| UX | 177225 | 188163 |
| NanoReview Score | 643690 | 854884 |
| Stability | 97 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 20 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 115.2 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 67.6 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 89.4 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 7.65 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 26.4 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 53.8 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 79.4 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 3.58 MP/sec | n/a |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
58 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
54 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
56 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
98 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
56 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime) - 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
- 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime Cortex-A720) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold Cortex-A720) - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver Cortex-A520) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2960 | 2700 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | 6.7 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 640 | Adreno 810 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 800 |
| GPU Frequency | 675 MHz | n/a |
| Execution Units | 3 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 128 |
| Total shader | 768 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 1036.8 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 690 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.13 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
- UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2900x1300 pixels |
| Camera | 1x192 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X24 LTE, X50 5G | Snapdragon X62 5G |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 20 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 5000 MB/s | Up to 2900 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1240 MB/s | Up to 1600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | April, 2019 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM8150-AC | SM7635-AC |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
