Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
43
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, vs Samsung Exynos 2200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 189310 | 316037 |
| GPU | 155621 | 424486 |
| Memory | 121534 | 170650 |
| UX | 177225 | 226015 |
| NanoReview Score | 643690 | 1137188 |
| Stability | 97 % | 61 % |
| Graphics Test | 20 fps | 49 fps |
| File Compression | 115.2 MB/s | 151.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 67.6 pages/s | 93.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 89.4 MP/sec | 106.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 7.65 frames/s | 13.3 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 26.4 frames/s | 27 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 53.8 frames/s | 92.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 79.4 MP/sec | 123.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.58 MP/sec | 4.48 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
58 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
54 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
56 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
98 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
56 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime) - 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
- 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 - 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 - 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2960 | 2800 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | 6.7 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 640 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Voyager (RDNA 2) |
| GPU Frequency | 675 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Execution Units | 3 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 128 |
| Total shader | 768 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 1036.8 GFLOPS | 1003 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 690 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.13 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x192 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X24 LTE, X50 5G | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 20 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 5000 MB/s | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1240 MB/s | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | April, 2019 yr | January, 2022 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | SM8150-AC | S5E9925 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
