Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
47
out 100
VS
35
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 232691 | 146117 |
| GPU | 195541 | 83020 |
| Memory | 142021 | 97461 |
| UX | 188011 | 116630 |
| NanoReview Score | 758192 | 443228 |
| Stability | 91 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 23 fps | 7 fps |
| File Compression | 150.9 MB/s | 106.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 84.1 pages/s | 58.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 109.4 MP/sec | 79.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 10.4 frames/s | 6.37 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 32.6 frames/s | 20.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 74.7 frames/s | 43.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 102.4 MP/sec | 68.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.19 MP/sec | 2.86 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
60 FPS (Ultra) | 66 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
61 FPS (Ultra) | 60 FPS (Low) |
 Fortnite |
30 FPS (Ultra) | 24 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 67 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
60 FPS (Ultra) | 57 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
59 FPS (Ultra) | 42 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
60 FPS (Ultra) | 19 FPS (Low) |
| Device | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (1080x2340) | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) - 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
- 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold Cortex-A78) - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2840 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | 10.3 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 587 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 3 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 128 |
| Total shader | 768 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 901.6 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 698 | Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X55 | Snapdragon X51 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 22 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7500 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3000 MB/s | Up to 1500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | December, 2019 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM8250-AB | SM6375 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
