Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
92
out 100
VS
24
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, vs Unisoc Tiger T610. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 475806 | 86249 |
| GPU | 881311 | 41435 |
| Memory | 390065 | 59358 |
| UX | 335026 | 63235 |
| NanoReview Score | 2082208 | 250277 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 3 fps |
| File Compression | 293.2 MB/s | 72.2 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 196.7 pages/s | 36.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 221.6 MP/sec | 49.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 24.1 frames/s | 3.17 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 63.9 frames/s | 10.8 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 154.6 frames/s | 22.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 217.4 MP/sec | 40.5 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 8.01 MP/sec | 2.01 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720 |
- 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3210 | 1820 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 825 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 800 | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1150 MHz | 614 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 512 | 24 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS | 58.9 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon | No |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 76.8 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2160x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x320 pixels | 1x16 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 4200 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | June, 2019 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Low end |
| Codename | SM8735 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
