Samsung Exynos 1280 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
34
out 100
VS
24
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1280, vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 154535 | 88676 |
| GPU | 105189 | 42169 |
| Memory | 92022 | 55367 |
| UX | 126780 | 65037 |
| NanoReview Score | 478526 | 251249 |
| Stability | 99 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 13 fps | 3 fps |
| File Compression | 97.2 MB/s | 79.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 50.8 pages/s | 41.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 70.9 MP/sec | 44.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.92 frames/s | 1.82 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 18.1 frames/s | 9.39 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 36 frames/s | 13.1 frames/s |
| HDR | 70.2 MP/sec | 49.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.04 MP/sec | 2 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 512 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 5.5 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Bifrost 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 897 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 8 |
| Total shader | 128 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 229.6 GFLOPS | 64 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | No |
| GPU Frequency | 4.3 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 2340x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2550 MB/s | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1280 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 4 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | March, 2022 yr | January, 2019 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | S5E8825 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1280 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 3
