Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
34
out 100
VS
44
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1280, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 154535 | 207306 |
| GPU | 105189 | 171454 |
| Memory | 92022 | 166898 |
| UX | 126780 | 131179 |
| NanoReview Score | 478526 | 676837 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 13 fps | 18 fps |
| File Compression | 97.2 MB/s | 130.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 50.8 pages/s | 71.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 70.9 MP/sec | 101.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.92 frames/s | 10.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 18.1 frames/s | 25 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 36 frames/s | 51.3 frames/s |
| HDR | 70.2 MP/sec | 84.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.04 MP/sec | 3.49 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1/2.4 (Cortex-A710) - 3/2.36 (Cortex-A710) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | n/a |
| L2 cache | n/a | 3 MB |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G68 MP4 | Adreno 644 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 897 MHz | 443 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 384 |
| Total shader | 128 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 229.6 GFLOPS | 680.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Hexagon |
| GPU Frequency | 4.3 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 2560x1600 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Snapdragon X62 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2550 MB/s | Up to 4400 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1280 MB/s | Up to 1600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | March, 2022 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | S5E8825 | SM7450-AB |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
