Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1380, vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Samsung Exynos 1380 and MediaTek Dimensity 9500
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Exynos 1380
598103
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3449366
CPU189257786574
GPU1360421422243
Memory118432725851
UX154372514698
NanoReview Score5981033449366
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Exynos 1380
2772
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
n/a
Graphics Test16 fpsn/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Samsung Exynos 1380
999
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3381
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Samsung Exynos 1380
2758
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
11289
File Compression142.3 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser75.9 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering105.2 MP/secn/a
Background Blur9.3 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing25.5 frames/sn/a
Image Detection52.9 frames/sn/a
HDR91.9 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing4.02 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78)
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/4 (Cortex-X930 Travis)
- 6/2.4 (Cortex-A730 Gelas)
Process Samsung TSMC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2400 4000
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L3 Cache 4 MB 16 MB
Process tech. 5 nm 3 nm
Power (TDP) 5 W n/a

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G68 MP5 n/a
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen n/a
GPU Frequency 949 MHz 1000 MHz
Execution Units 5 n/a
Shader Units 32 n/a
Total shader 160 n/a
FLOPS 303.7 GFLOPS 5315 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 n/a
OpenCL 2.0 n/a

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes MediaTek NPU 9.0
GPU Frequency 4.9 TOPS 100 TOPS

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz n/a
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s n/a
Max RAM 8 GB n/a

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.1
Max. resolution 2960x1440 pixels n/a
Camera 1x200 pixels 1x320 pixels
Video recording 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video quality 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G Support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G Support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3790 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 1280 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 6 7
Bluetooth version 5.3 6.0
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced February, 2023 yr September, 2025 yr
Class Mid-range Flagship
Codename S5E8835 n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1380 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below