Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
45
out 100
VS
13
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1480, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 227818 | 44542 |
| GPU | 166248 | 28537 |
| Memory | 150386 | 22889 |
| UX | 178841 | 29277 |
| NanoReview Score | 723293 | 125245 |
| Graphics Test | 23 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 176.8 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 89.8 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 149.2 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 13.5 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 32.7 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 67.2 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 113.8 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 4.92 MP/sec | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.5 GHz – Krait |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2750 | 2500 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 1 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Samsung Xclipse 530 | Adreno 330 |
| Architecture | Titan (RDNA 2) | Adreno 300 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 578 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 332.8 GFLOPS | 148 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Hexagon |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
eMMC 5.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 2560x2048 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x21 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 5 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 5100 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1280 MB/s | Up to 50 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 4.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | March, 2024 yr | February, 2014 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | S5E8845 | MSM8974 v3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1480 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
