Samsung Exynos 1580 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
56
out 100
VS
35
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1580, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 289519 | 142605 |
| GPU | 265302 | 91935 |
| Memory | 156294 | 94475 |
| UX | 195882 | 108048 |
| NanoReview Score | 906997 | 437036 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 9 fps |
| File Compression | 184.3 MB/s | 89.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 112.2 pages/s | 40.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 138.4 MP/sec | 57.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 15 frames/s | 5.58 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 35 frames/s | 18.8 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 68 frames/s | 37.7 frames/s |
| HDR | 104.8 MP/sec | 56 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.96 MP/sec | 2.51 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 57 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 38 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 29 FPS (Medium) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 67 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 55 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
- 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76) - 1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76) - 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2900 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Samsung Xclipse 540 | Adreno 620 |
| Architecture | Magellan (RDNA 3) | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 192 |
| Total shader | 256 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 1331.2 GFLOPS | 480 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Hexagon 696 |
| GPU Frequency | 14.7 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 3200x1800 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x192 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X52 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 5100 MB/s | Up to 3700 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1280 MB/s | Up to 1600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | December, 2019 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | S5E8855 | SM7250-AB |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1580 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
