Samsung Exynos 1580 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
56
out 100
VS
29
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1580, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 289519 | 97035 |
| GPU | 265302 | 116400 |
| Memory | 156294 | 87397 |
| UX | 195882 | 67775 |
| NanoReview Score | 906997 | 368607 |
| Stability | n/a | 95 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 6 fps |
| File Compression | 184.3 MB/s | 89.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 112.2 pages/s | 51.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 138.4 MP/sec | 58.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 15 frames/s | 2.83 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 35 frames/s | 12 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 68 frames/s | 14.1 frames/s |
| HDR | 104.8 MP/sec | 55.2 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.96 MP/sec | 2.43 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
- 4/2.45 (Kryo 280 Cortex-A73) - 4/1.9 (Kryo 280 Cortex-A53) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2900 | 2450 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 3 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 9 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Samsung Xclipse 540 | Adreno 540 |
| Architecture | Magellan (RDNA 3) | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 710 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 64 |
| Total shader | 256 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 1331.2 GFLOPS | 363.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Hexagon 682 |
| GPU Frequency | 14.7 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 29.8 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X16 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 16 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 5100 MB/s | Up to 1000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1280 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | November, 2016 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | S5E8855 | MSM8998 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1580 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
