Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio G99
53
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 2100, vs MediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 264571 | 131367 |
| GPU | 297459 | 71737 |
| Memory | 144480 | 100728 |
| UX | 188158 | 118629 |
| NanoReview Score | 894668 | 422461 |
| Stability | 66 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 34 fps | 7 fps |
| File Compression | 157.4 MB/s | 99.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 75.1 pages/s | 50.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 105.8 MP/sec | 70.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 12.7 frames/s | 6.15 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 21.1 frames/s | 18.8 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 70.4 frames/s | 40.1 frames/s |
| HDR | 112.2 MP/sec | 54.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.42 MP/sec | 2.79 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 86 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 37 FPS (Ultra) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 91 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 66 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 55 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 48 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Cubot X70 (1080x2408) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1 - 3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2900 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 8 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G78 MP14 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 854 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 14 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shader | 448 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 765.2 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | 26 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 17.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5300 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 MB/s | Up to 650 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | December, 2020 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | S5E9840 | MT6789 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2100 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 3
