Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
n/a
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 2500, vs Samsung Exynos 2400e. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 500921 | 434890 |
| GPU | 928912 | 726970 |
| Memory | 410202 | 318963 |
| UX | 373762 | 296630 |
| NanoReview Score | 2213797 | 1777453 |
| File Compression | 386.4 MB/s | 258.1 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 234.1 pages/s | 188 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 272.4 MP/sec | 204.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 36.6 frames/s | 20.2 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 86.3 frames/s | 61.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 246.4 frames/s | 145 frames/s |
| HDR | 313.6 MP/sec | 199.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 13 MP/sec | 7.31 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925 - 2x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 3x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
- 1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 3x 2.59 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 4x 1.96 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 10 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3300 | 3110 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 4 nm |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Magellan (RDNA 3) |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Execution Units | 8 | 6 |
| Shader Units | n/a | 128 |
| Total shader | n/a | 768 |
| FLOPS | n/a | 3406.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 77 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 4.0 - UFS 4.1 |
- UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 9640 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 2550 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | September, 2024 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | S5E9955 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2400e the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
