Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
23
out 100
VS
39
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 9610, vs Samsung Exynos 1380. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 83882 | 189257 |
| GPU | 42251 | 136042 |
| Memory | 58058 | 118432 |
| UX | 75732 | 154372 |
| NanoReview Score | 259923 | 598103 |
| Stability | 97 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | 16 fps |
| File Compression | 68.5 MB/s | 142.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 33.7 pages/s | 75.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 33.4 MP/sec | 105.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.54 frames/s | 9.3 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 7.39 frames/s | 25.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 12 frames/s | 52.9 frames/s |
| HDR | 44.9 MP/sec | 91.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.87 MP/sec | 4.02 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A73) - 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 8 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1053 MHz | 949 MHz |
| Execution Units | 3 | 5 |
| Shader Units | 12 | 32 |
| Total shader | 24 | 160 |
| FLOPS | 40.8 GFLOPS | 303.7 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 4.9 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 11.9 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2560x1600 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x24 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Shannon 337 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 3790 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1280 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | March, 2018 yr | February, 2023 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | S5E9610 | S5E8835 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1380 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
