Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
24
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 9611, vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 64779 | 267830 |
| GPU | 56523 | 237310 |
| Memory | 58421 | 198476 |
| UX | 80023 | 230157 |
| NanoReview Score | 259746 | 933773 |
| Stability | 73 % | 95 % |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | 35 fps |
| File Compression | 70.5 MB/s | 172.8 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 37.2 pages/s | 108 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 43 MP/sec | 140.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.5 frames/s | 14.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 8.33 frames/s | 34.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 11.9 frames/s | 86.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 43.6 MP/sec | 118.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.95 MP/sec | 4.63 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
31 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
40 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
43 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
38 FPS (High) | n/a |
| Device | Samsung Galaxy A51 (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 4/2 (Cortex A55) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 | 3100 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G610 MP6 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Valhall 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution Units | 3 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 12 | 64 |
| Total shader | 24 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 61.2 GFLOPS | 729.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | MediaTek APU 580 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 11.9 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2560x1600 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x64 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | Shannon 337 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 4700 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | September, 2019 yr | December, 2022 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | S5E9611 | MT6896Z |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
