Unisoc T606 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
24
out 100
VS
39
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Unisoc T606, vs Samsung Exynos 9820. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 80363 | 170665 |
| GPU | 23190 | 197730 |
| Memory | 79761 | 127795 |
| UX | 62883 | 128053 |
| NanoReview Score | 246197 | 624243 |
| Stability | n/a | 82 % |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | 19 fps |
| File Compression | 68.4 MB/s | 100.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 39.4 pages/s | 67.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 49.8 MP/sec | 68.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.7 frames/s | 6.22 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 13.2 frames/s | 21.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 23.6 frames/s | 46.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 41.4 MP/sec | 78.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.99 MP/sec | 3.01 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2/2.73 (Mongoose M4) - 2/2.31 (Cortex-A75) - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1600 | 2730 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 8.5 billion |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Bifrost 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 702 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 12 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 24 |
| Total shader | 32 | 288 |
| FLOPS | 41.6 GFLOPS | 404.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.0 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2400x1080 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | 1x24 pixels | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5100 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 20 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 2000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 316 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | September, 2021 yr | November, 2018 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | S5E9820 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 9820 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
