Unisoc T8300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
35
out 100
VS
23
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Unisoc T8300, vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 162638 | 86750 |
| GPU | 78410 | 34226 |
| Memory | 119042 | 53515 |
| UX | 119509 | 63929 |
| NanoReview Score | 479599 | 238420 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 3 fps |
| File Compression | 110.4 MB/s | 74 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 50.3 pages/s | 31.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 78 MP/sec | 48.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 6.91 frames/s | 1.93 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 18.5 frames/s | 8.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 38.5 frames/s | 13.7 frames/s |
| HDR | 65.3 MP/sec | 41.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.27 MP/sec | 1.9 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 48 FPS (Medium) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 30 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 26 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 54 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 60 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 58 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Huawei Honor 9C (1560x720) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 512 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Bifrost 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 8 |
| Total shader | 64 | 32 |
| FLOPS | n/a | 64 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | No |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.07 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | n/a | 2340x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x40 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 4 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Unisoc T8300 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
