Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Samsung Exynos 1330

Compared 2 processors: Unisoc Tiger T612, vs Samsung Exynos 1330. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Unisoc Tiger T612 and Samsung Exynos 1330
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Unisoc Tiger T612
244716
Samsung Exynos 1330
438848
CPU91018161056
GPU2260063510
Memory6518489135
UX65914125147
NanoReview Score244716438848
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Unisoc Tiger T612
424
Samsung Exynos 1330
1385
Stabilityn/a99 %
Graphics Test2 fps8 fps
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Unisoc Tiger T612
422
Samsung Exynos 1330
929
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Unisoc Tiger T612
1509
Samsung Exynos 1330
2128
File Compression76.7 MB/s108 MB/s
HTML5 Browser43.6 pages/s58.9 pages/s
PDF Rendering53.5 MP/sec81 MP/sec
Background Blur4.12 frames/s5.89 frames/s
Photo Processing14.5 frames/s21.4 frames/s
Image Detection25 frames/s40.6 frames/s
HDR44.7 MP/sec66.7 MP/sec
Ray Tracing2.22 MP/sec3.06 MP/sec

Processor

Architecture - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75)
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78)
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
Process TSMC Samsung
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 1800 2400
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process tech. 12 nm 5 nm
Power (TDP) n/a 5 W

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G68 MP2
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU Frequency 650 MHz 949 MHz
Execution Units 1 2
Shader Units 32 32
Total shader 32 64
FLOPS 39.3 GFLOPS 121.5 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenCL 2.0 2.0

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence n/a Yes
GPU Frequency n/a 4.9 TOPS

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 1866 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x32 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth n/a 51.2 Gbit/s
Max RAM 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type - eMMC 5.1
- UFS 2.1
- UFS 2.2
- UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.1
Max. resolution 2400x1080 pixels 2960x1440 pixels
Camera 1x108 pixels 1x108 pixels
Video recording 1K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video quality 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G Support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 18
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 300 MB/s Up to 2550 MB/s
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s Up to 1280 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 5 5
Bluetooth version 5.0 5.2
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo

Other

Announced May, 2022 yr February, 2023 yr
Class Low end Low end
Codename n/a S5E8535

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1330 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below