Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
25
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Unisoc Tiger T615, vs Samsung Exynos 2100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 88108 | 264571 |
| GPU | 30185 | 297459 |
| Memory | 73422 | 144480 |
| UX | 66427 | 188158 |
| NanoReview Score | 258142 | 894668 |
| Stability | n/a | 66 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 34 fps |
| File Compression | 71.1 MB/s | 157.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 39.4 pages/s | 75.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 52.4 MP/sec | 105.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.85 frames/s | 12.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 12 frames/s | 21.1 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 23.1 frames/s | 70.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 44.2 MP/sec | 112.2 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.03 MP/sec | 4.42 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1 - 3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1800 | 2900 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 8 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G78 MP14 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 854 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 14 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shader | 32 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | 765.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2408x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 8K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | December, 2020 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | S5E9840 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2100 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
