Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
25
out 100
VS
39
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Unisoc Tiger T616, vs Samsung Exynos 1380. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 89479 | 189257 |
| GPU | 26174 | 136042 |
| Memory | 104216 | 118432 |
| UX | 72789 | 154372 |
| NanoReview Score | 292658 | 598103 |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | 16 fps |
| File Compression | 76.7 MB/s | 142.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 42.7 pages/s | 75.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 47.5 MP/sec | 105.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.74 frames/s | 9.3 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 14.3 frames/s | 25.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 26 frames/s | 52.9 frames/s |
| HDR | 46 MP/sec | 91.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.2 MP/sec | 4.02 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 949 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 5 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shader | 32 | 160 |
| FLOPS | 48 GFLOPS | 303.7 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 4.9 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.0 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2400x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 3790 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1280 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | January, 2021 yr | February, 2023 yr |
| Class | Low end | Mid-range |
| Codename | n/a | S5E8835 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1380 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
