Unisoc Tiger T620 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
27
out 100
VS
38
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Unisoc Tiger T620, vs HiSilicon Kirin 980. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 101047 | 193866 |
| GPU | 30281 | 159831 |
| Memory | 116778 | 114872 |
| UX | 84809 | 123183 |
| NanoReview Score | 332915 | 591752 |
| Stability | n/a | 48 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 14 fps |
| File Compression | 78.2 MB/s | 94.5 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 44.9 pages/s | 50.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 54.4 MP/sec | 62.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.42 frames/s | 6.54 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 14.9 frames/s | 18.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 25.9 frames/s | 48 frames/s |
| HDR | 45.6 MP/sec | 54.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.23 MP/sec | 2.59 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 56 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 39 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 28 FPS (High) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 51 FPS (Ultra) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Huawei Nova 5T (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2/2.6 (Cortex-A76) - 2/1.92 (Cortex-A76) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 2600 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 6.9 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Bifrost 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 10 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 24 |
| Total shader | 32 | 240 |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | 345.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 |
- UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2408x1080 pixels | 3120x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 1400 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 200 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | August, 2018 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 980 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
