Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Compared 2 processors: Unisoc Tiger T700, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Unisoc Tiger T700 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Unisoc Tiger T700
260484
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
758192
CPU84091232691
GPU45223195541
Memory60953142021
UX70217188011
NanoReview Score260484758192
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Unisoc Tiger T700
n/a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3875
Stabilityn/a91 %
Graphics Testn/a23 fps
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Unisoc Tiger T700
429
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
1117
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Unisoc Tiger T700
1434
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3274
File Compression72.2 MB/s150.9 MB/s
HTML5 Browser41.2 pages/s84.1 pages/s
PDF Rendering48.7 MP/sec109.4 MP/sec
Background Blur3.45 frames/s10.4 frames/s
Photo Processing11.7 frames/s32.6 frames/s
Image Detection26.1 frames/s74.7 frames/s
HDR45.1 MP/sec102.4 MP/sec
Ray Tracing1.88 MP/sec4.19 MP/sec

Games

Graphics in popular 3D games
PUBGPUBG Mobile n/a 60 FPS (Ultra)
CODCall of Duty: Mobile n/a 61 FPS (Ultra)
FortniteFortnite n/a 30 FPS (Ultra)
World of Tanks BlitzWorld of Tanks Blitz n/a 60 FPS (Ultra)
Mobile Legends: Bang BangGenshin Impact n/a 59 FPS (Ultra)
Genshin ImpactMobile Legends: Bang Bang n/a 60 FPS (Ultra)
Device n/a Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (1080x2340)

Processor

Architecture - 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
- 6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
- 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
- 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
- 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Process TSMC TSMC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 1820 2840
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache n/a 512 KB
L2 cache n/a 1 MB
L3 Cache n/a 4 MB
Process tech. 12 nm 7 nm
Transistor count n/a 10.3 billion
Power (TDP) n/a 5 W

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G52 MP2 Adreno 650
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU Frequency 850 MHz 587 MHz
Execution Units 2 3
Shader Units 24 256
Total shader 48 768
FLOPS 81.6 GFLOPS 901.6 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.1
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX n/a 12.1

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Hexagon 698

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 1866 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth n/a 44 Gbit/s
Max RAM 6 GB 16 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type - eMMC 5.1
- UFS 2.1
- UFS 3.0
- UFS 3.1
Max. resolution 2160x1080 pixels 3840x2160 pixels
Camera 1x48 pixels 1x200 pixels
Video recording 1K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video quality 1080p at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem n/a X55
4G Support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 22
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 300 MB/s Up to 7500 MB/s
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s Up to 3000 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 5 6
Bluetooth version 5.0 5.1
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- SBAS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced March, 2021 yr December, 2019 yr
Class Low end Flagship
Codename n/a SM8250-AB

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below