Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
96
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Xiaomi Xring O1, vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 610476 | 786574 |
| GPU | 990126 | 1422243 |
| Memory | 533495 | 725851 |
| UX | 367273 | 514698 |
| NanoReview Score | 2501370 | 3449366 |
| File Compression | 375.2 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 279.9 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 307.7 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 37.2 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 106.3 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 242.2 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 299.3 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 9.25 MP/sec | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 3.9 GHz – Cortex-X925 - 4x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 2x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
- 2/4 (Cortex-X930 Travis) - 6/2.4 (Cortex-A730 Gelas) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 10 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3900 | 4000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor count | 19 billion | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | n/a |
| Architecture | Valhall 5th gen | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 16 | n/a |
| Shader Units | 128 | n/a |
| Total shader | 2048 | n/a |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 5315 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | n/a |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | MediaTek NPU 9.0 |
| GPU Frequency | 44 TOPS | 100 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5T | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 76.8 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | n/a |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.1 | - UFS 4.0 - UFS 4.1 |
| Camera | n/a | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | n/a |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7900 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 4200 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Xring O1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
