Honor Pad 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor Pad 10 Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A11, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor Pad 10
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10100mAh vs 5100mAh
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
- Lighter design: 335g vs 525g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 4/64 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 12.1 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 1600x2560 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 249 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4 % | 81.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 277.1 mm (10.91 in) | 211 mm (8.31 in) |
| Width | 179.3 mm (7.06 in) | 124.7 mm (4.91 in) |
| Thickness | 6.3 mm (0.25 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 525 g (18.52 oz) | 335 g (11.82 oz) |
| Area | 497 cm² (77.04 in²) | 263 cm² (40.77 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Blue - Green |
- Silver - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 2630 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)) - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 720 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 975 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 998.4 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 150 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3196 | 2103 |
| CPU | 267568 | 127969 |
| GPU | 232601 | 66079 |
| Memory | 197306 | 111206 |
| UX | 157850 | 107944 |
| NanoReview Score | 855325 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9 | One UI 7.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 10100 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (51% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 2:28 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 35 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor Pad 10 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0