Home Tablet comparison Honor Pad 10 and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 - Which is better?

Honor Pad 10 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

67 out 100
Honor Pad 10
VS
80 out 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Honor Pad 10
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

Compared 2 smartphones : Honor Pad 10 Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Honor Pad 10
  • Larger display: 12.1in
  • Higher battery capacity: 10100mAh vs 8850mAh
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
  • Higher pixel density: 344ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 500g vs 525g
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options n/a - 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Honor Pad 10 and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Honor Pad 10
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 in 11.2 in
Resolution 1600x2560 pixels 2136x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 3:2
Pixel density 249 ppi 344 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes n/a
Max brightness n/a 800 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 85.4 % 85.7 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 277.1 mm (10.91 in) 251.22 mm (9.89 in)
Width 179.3 mm (7.06 in) 173.42 mm (6.83 in)
Thickness 6.3 mm (0.25 in) 6.18 mm (0.24 in)
Weight 525 g (18.52 oz) 500 g (17.64 oz)
Area 497 cm² (77.04 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Blue
- Green		 - Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Honor Pad 10
85.4 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
85.7 %

Performance

Testing Honor Pad 10 and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Max Frequency 2630 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
- 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))		 - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes Yes
Graphics Adreno 720 Adreno 732
GPU Cores 512 768
GPU Frequency 975 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS 1459.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Honor Pad 10
150
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
1873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Honor Pad 10
3196
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
5149
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1501873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)31965149
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Xiaomi Poco Pad X1]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Honor Pad 10
855325
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
n/a
CPU267568365078
GPU232601467273
Memory197306309615
UX157850239702
NanoReview Score855325n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory Cardn/aNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin MagicOS 9 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 10100 mAh 8850 mAh
Max Charging Power 35 W 45 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 1:20 h

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 3264x2448 pixels 4160x3120 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 13 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix8 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Sensorn/aOmnivision OV13B10
Sensor sizen/a1/3.06 (0.33)
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Matrix 3264x2448 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.3
Sensor n/a Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size n/a 1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNon/a
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers 6.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Release Date May, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Sensors Accelerometer - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 35 W Yes, 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
1 (33.33%)
2 (66.67%)
Total Votes: 3

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below