Home Tablet comparison Honor Pad X7 and Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 - Which is better?

Honor Pad X7 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad C1

53 out 100
Honor Pad X7
VS
59 out 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
Honor Pad X7
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1

Compared 2 smartphones : Honor Pad X7 Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 8.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad C1, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X7
  • Lighter design: 365g vs 406g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
  • Larger display: 9.7in
  • Higher pixel density: 268ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 7600mAh vs 7020mAh

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options n/a - 4/64 GB
- 6/128 GB

Review

Key Specs Honor Pad X7 and Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Honor Pad X7
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 8.7 in 9.7 in
Resolution 800x1340 pixels 1280x2048 pixels
Aspect ratio 5:3 n/a
Pixel density 179 ppi 268 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate n/a Yes
Max brightness 625 nits 600 nits
HDR support No No
Screen-to-body ratio 81.5 % 87.9 %

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 211.8 mm (8.34 in) 226.51 mm (8.92 in)
Width 124.8 mm (4.91 in) 147.97 mm (5.83 in)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 in) 7.4 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 365 g (12.87 oz) 406 g (14.32 oz)
Area 264 cm² (40.92 in²) 335 cm² (51.93 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors Gray - Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Honor Pad X7
81.5 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
87.9 %

Performance

Testing Honor Pad X7 and Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
Max Frequency 2400 MHz 2900 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53))
- 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73))		 - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/2.9 (Cortex-A73)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon 686 Hexagon
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Honor Pad X7
407
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
490
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Honor Pad X7
1309
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
1512
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)407490
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)13091512
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Honor Pad X7]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Honor Pad X7
2817990
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
511632
CPU849957200538
GPU97843229602
Memory398278114287
UX591323138620
NanoReview Score2817990511632

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency n/a 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB64 GB
Storage Typen/aUFS 2.2
Memory CardMicroSDMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 16

Battery

Volume 7020 mAh 7600 mAh
Max Charging Power 10 W 18 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging No Yes

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution n/a 3264x2448 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion n/a No
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix8 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.0
Sensor sizen/a1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 5 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor n/a CMOS
Sensor size n/a 1/5.0 (0.2)
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM TypeNoNo
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Budget Budget
Announced July, 2025 yr May, 2026 yr
Release Date July, 2025 yr May, 2026 yr
Sensors Accelerometer - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes, 10 W Yes, 18 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below