Honor Pad X9 vs OnePlus Pad Go 2
50
out 100
VS
71
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor Pad X9 Manufactured in July, 2023, with display 11.5 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs OnePlus Pad Go 2, Manufactured in December, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X9
- Lighter design: 499g vs 597g
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad Go 2
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 283ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 10050mAh vs 7250mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.5 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2000 pixels | 1980x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 7:5 |
| Pixel density | 203 ppi | 283 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1 % | 87.1 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 267.3 mm (10.52 in) | 266.01 mm (10.47 in) |
| Width | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) | 192.77 mm (7.59 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 6.83 mm (0.27 in) |
| Weight | 499 g (17.6 oz) | 597 g (21.06 oz) |
| Area | 447 cm² (69.29 in²) | 513 cm² (79.52 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Silver - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 477 | 1003 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1551 | 3112 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 570 | n/a |
| CPU | 110393 | 348329 |
| GPU | 40144 | 129977 |
| Memory | 92324 | 216406 |
| UX | 80831 | 316570 |
| NanoReview Score | 323692 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 7.1 | OxygenOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 7250 mAh | 10050 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (34% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:04 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:56 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:02 h | n/a |
| Games | 07:03 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 5 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2023 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2023 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | No | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus Pad Go 2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
