Honor Pad X9 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
50
out 100
VS
61
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor Pad X9 Manufactured in July, 2023, with display 11.5 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite, Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1380. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X9
- Larger display: 11.5in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 499g vs 524g
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 228ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 7250mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.5 in | 10.9 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2000 pixels | 1320x2112 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 203 ppi | 228 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | n/a |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1 % | 81.7 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 267.3 mm (10.52 in) | 254.3 mm (10.01 in) |
| Width | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) | 165.8 mm (6.53 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 6.5 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 499 g (17.6 oz) | 524 g (18.48 oz) |
| Area | 447 cm² (69.29 in²) | 422 cm² (65.41 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Silver - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 160 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 949 MHz |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 303.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 477 | 1011 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1551 | 2951 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 570 | n/a |
| CPU | 110393 | 197333 |
| GPU | 40144 | 168831 |
| Memory | 92324 | 113518 |
| UX | 80831 | 144132 |
| NanoReview Score | 323692 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 7.1 | One UI 7.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7250 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (34% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:04 h | 2:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:56 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:02 h | n/a |
| Games | 07:03 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 5 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2023 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2023 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
