Honor Pad X9 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad
50
out 100
VS
69
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor Pad X9 Manufactured in July, 2023, with display 11.5 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X9
- Lighter design: 499g vs 571g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 7250mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.5 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2000 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 203 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 267.3 mm (10.52 in) | 280 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) | 181.85 mm (7.16 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 7.52 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 499 g (17.6 oz) | 571 g (20.14 oz) |
| Area | 447 cm² (69.29 in²) | 509 cm² (78.9 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | n/a |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 477 | 1020 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1551 | 3012 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 570 | n/a |
| CPU | 110393 | 208949 |
| GPU | 40144 | 119652 |
| Memory | 92324 | 137831 |
| UX | 80831 | 152455 |
| NanoReview Score | 323692 | 618887 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 7.1 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7250 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (34% in 30 min) | Yes (29% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:04 h | 2:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:56 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:02 h | n/a |
| Games | 07:03 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 5 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2023 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2023 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
