Huawei MatePad 11.5 S vs Honor Pad X9a
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 11.5 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000WL, vs Honor Pad X9a, Manufactured in March, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
- Higher pixel density: 291ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 8300mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.0 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X9a
- Lighter design: 475g vs 510g
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.5 in | 11.5 in |
| Resolution | 1840x2800 pixels | 1504x2508 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 84.1 % |
| sRGB gamut | 97.4 % | n/a |
| Response time | 23 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 516:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 261 mm (10.28 in) | 267.3 mm (10.52 in) |
| Width | 177.2 mm (6.98 in) | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) | 6.77 mm (0.27 in) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 475 g (16.76 oz) |
| Area | 462 cm² (71.61 in²) | 447 cm² (69.29 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Purple |
Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max Frequency | 2490 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Hexagon 686 |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1241 | 471 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3882 | 1505 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2591 | n/a |
| CPU | 213665 | 191663 |
| GPU | n/a | 29731 |
| Memory | 148262 | 110054 |
| UX | 148835 | 129788 |
| NanoReview Score | 510762 | 461236 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 9118 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | n/a | MagicOS 9 |
Battery
| Volume | 8800 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0 (0.2) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4608x3456 pixels | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.0 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 399 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad 11.5 S the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0