Huawei MatePad 11.5 S vs OnePlus Pad Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 11.5 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000WL, vs OnePlus Pad Lite, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
- Larger display: 11.5in
- Higher pixel density: 291ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 510g vs 530g
- Supports newer USB: 3.0 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad Lite
- Higher battery capacity: 9340mAh vs 8800mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.5 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1840x2800 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 207 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 82.7 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 97.4 % | n/a |
| Response time | 23 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 516:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 261 mm (10.28 in) | 254.91 mm (10.04 in) |
| Width | 177.2 mm (6.98 in) | 166.46 mm (6.55 in) |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) | 7.39 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 530 g (18.7 oz) |
| Area | 462 cm² (71.61 in²) | 424 cm² (65.72 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Purple |
Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | MediaTek Helio G100 |
| Max Frequency | 2490 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Yes |
| Graphics | n/a | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1241 | 729 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3882 | 2031 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2591 | n/a |
| CPU | 213665 | 129129 |
| GPU | n/a | 65647 |
| Memory | 148262 | 112440 |
| UX | 148835 | 114070 |
| NanoReview Score | 510762 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | n/a |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | n/a | OxygenOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 8800 mAh | 9340 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 5 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.0 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 399 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad 11.5 S the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0