Huawei MatePad 11.5 S vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
70
out 100
VS
80
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 11.5 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000WL, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
- Larger display: 11.5in
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Lighter design: 500g vs 510g
- Higher battery capacity: 8850mAh vs 8800mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.0
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.5 in | 11.2 in |
| Resolution | 1840x2800 pixels | 2136x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 85.7 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 97.4 % | n/a |
| Response time | 23 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 516:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 261 mm (10.28 in) | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) |
| Width | 177.2 mm (6.98 in) | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) | 6.18 mm (0.24 in) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 500 g (17.64 oz) |
| Area | 462 cm² (71.61 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Purple |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2490 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Yes |
| Graphics | n/a | Adreno 732 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 1459.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1241 | 1873 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3882 | 5149 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2591 | n/a |
| CPU | 213665 | 365078 |
| GPU | n/a | 467273 |
| Memory | 148262 | 309615 |
| UX | 148835 | 239702 |
| NanoReview Score | 510762 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | n/a | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8800 mAh | 8850 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 1:20 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV13B10 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06 (0.33) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 4608x3456 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | Omnivision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 399 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
